AcIRSTD crestThe Academy of Innovative Research,
Science & Technological Development

For Authors

Review and Publication Process

The IJSRITD accepts not or publishes manuscripts in its journal without prior peer review. There shall be a review process of manuscripts by one or more independent referees who are conversant in the pertinent subject area.

Authors should strive for maximum clarity of expression, bearing in mind that the purpose of publication is the disclosure of technical knowledge and that an excessively complex or poorly written presentation can only obscure the significance of the work presented. Material which is not essential to the continuity of the text (e.g., proofs, derivations, or calculations) be placed in Appendices

The editor evaluates the recommendation and notifies the author of the manuscript status. The manuscript may be:

  • Accepted for publication with minor changes, with no re-review necessary
  • Accepted for publication after substantial revision and additional review
  • Accepted for publication as is
  • >

Rejected.

The comments of the anonymous reviewers will be forwarded to the authors, and when the authors are ready to submit their revised manuscript, read the comments of the editors and reviewers, and respond to them by telling what modifications they have made in their manuscript or why they have not made the suggested changes.

Material which has been previously copyrighted, published, or accepted for publication will not be considered for publication in the journals.

The review process shall ensure that all authors have equal opportunity for publication of their papers. Acceptance and scheduling of publication of papers in these periodicals shall not be impeded by added criteria and procedures beyond those contained in the review process.

The editorial board is highly committed to the quick review process of the paper, but not with the sacrifice of the right judgment of a paper. The review process takes maximum two weeks.

Type of Papers

Comparative Study: In the early phases of the formation of a branch of science, the comparative technique is frequently used. It can assist the researcher in progressing from exploratory case studies to more complex theoretical models, invariances, and concepts like as causality and evolution.​

Survey Paper: The author's opinion is based on studying and assessing various research articles (that have already been published) on a certain issue.​

Case Study: A case study is an in-depth research of a particular person, organisation, or event in order to uncover the reasons of underlying principles. A case study is an analysis of a person, organisation, or event that is both descriptive and exploratory.​​

Research Paper: A research paper is a type of academic writing that is based on the author's original research on a certain subject. The author must conduct a thorough examination and precise interpretation of his or her study findings. This research could be part of a Master's degree programme or a doctoral thesis.

Review Paper: The goal of a review article is to provide a short overview of recent developments in a certain field. The present state of knowledge on the topic is summarised in a review paper. It gives the reader a better knowledge of the subject by discussing the findings of recent research publications.​

Dissertation Chapter: If you're presently focusing on a thesis or dissertation, you should be aware that it should be broken down into sections. The opening chapter, the dissertation chapter (literature review), another dissertation methodology chapter, discussion, and the last “conclusion” chapter are usually the essential sections of a thesis.​​

Keywords: Keywords are words or phrases that describe content.

Abstract: An abstract is a brief synopsis of a research article, thesis, review, conference proceeding, or any in-depth investigation of a certain subject that is frequently used to assist the reader in immediately determining the paper's aim.​​

Duties of Authors

Authorship of the Paper: Authorship should be limited to those who have made a substantial contribution to the reporting study's creation, design, execution or interpretation. As co-authors, all those who have made valuable contributions should be mentioned. They should be remembered or identified as participants where others have engaged in some substantive aspects of the research project.​

Originality and Plagiarism: Authors should confirm that they have written fully original works, and this must be properly referenced or quoted if the authors have used the work and/or words of others. Submission is an indication that the manuscript has not been previously published and is not being considered elsewhere for publication. Authors would be supposed to sign a copyright transfer document (to be issued by the Editor) before the manuscript could be published. You are considered to have given permission to print the manuscript by mailing the manuscript to the editor or publisher.​

Reporting Standards: Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. The underlying data should be correctly reflected in the document. To allow others to reproduce the work, a paper should include ample detail and references. Fraudulent or intentionally false claims constitute unethical actions and are inappropriate.​

Acknowledgement of Sources: Proper acknowledgement of others' work must always be given. In deciding the essence of the recorded work, writers should cite publications that were influential.​

Data Access and Retention: Authors may be required to provide raw data in the form of an editorial review paper and should be prepared, where possible, to provide public access to such data and, in any case, be prepared to maintain such data for a fair period of time after publication.

Multiple Publications: Manuscripts detailing exactly the same study should not necessarily be published by an author in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript simultaneously to more than one journal constitutes unethical and inappropriate publishing conduct.

Authors Guidelines

Authors should submit only papers that have been carefully proof read and polished. Before submission please make sure that your paper is prepared using the journal paper template. This will ensure fast processing and publication. Acceptance or rejection notification will be sent to all authors.

IJSRITD invites contribution in the following categories:

Research is original.

Technical and ethical notes.

Speedy communications: Short, independent articles on the ongoing researches.

IJSRITD provides extensive and analytical review on the scientific topics.

The authors can also submit the extensions of the already published papers in conferences and/or journals. English is the only language supported by IJSRITD with the page limit of 100 double-column pages as per the paper format of IJSRITD.

The submitted paper has to be written in MS Word format with file extension .doc or .docx.

The names of the authors given in the final manuscript are indexed in the open journal.

Author Benefits

International Journal of Scientific Research, Innovation and Technological Development (IJSRITD) includes:

If any of the authors and co-authors is part of the editorial board, then this organization offers the various facilities to them. We shall be glad to receive your technical contributions at your earliest convenience. Please publicize this journal amongst your colleagues for possible contribution and subscription.

To promote the researcher’s innovative idea through the publication process and to share their valuable proposal with us, at the same time this organization offers the authors a very less publication charges.

All abstracts and full text available free on-line to all main universities/institutions worldwide ensures promotion to the widest possible audience.

Access free on-line issue of all journals.

The manuscript publication charges are to be paid for qualitative manuscript and normal publication process.

Excellent editorial standards with better communication.

A precise, fast and constructive peer review process.